🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny as they see fit. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying placards against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.